WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,427
|
Post by WDB on Sept 24, 2017 17:08:31 GMT
I did ask. Apparently the saloon I drove yesterday had it but the estate I tried in June did not. I remember salesman tweaking a mode dial in the estate, while I was trying to spot changes in ride characteristics; he explained yesterday that what he'd been changing were engine and transmission mode settings. My memory of that drive (540i Touring) is of being impressed by the ride being the equal of the CLS I'd driven earlier that day, but of the car having (slightly) pointier handling.
Or, to put it another way, I appear to have driven (quite hard) a car without VDC and not missed it. This does seem to be contrary to the advice of just about every print media expert - and now our own. 😋
|
|
WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,427
|
Post by WDB on Sept 24, 2017 17:14:45 GMT
As you're prepared to buy either new or nearly-new, have you considered a nearly-new 540i Touring? That would give you the six cylinders that you really deserve if you're spending that sort of money. I would, Avant, but there really aren't any. The model is three months old in the UK and more than half of sales are the 520d, which I don't want, capable as it undoubtedly would be. Sunroofs are a problem here too. It's not a critical pass-fail as in the CLS, but the car has better headroom and more seat-position options without, so I really don't want one. There's also the cash flow question. If I want BMW's cheap money, I have to buy new. Mercedes money costs more - and in any case, 18-month-old CLS SBs are available and better value. M
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 21:15:25 GMT
For that money I'd want six cylinders. Four plus turbo is simply not the same. BMW - The ultimate driving machine? Not with four cylinders it's not. The main reason for buying a 320i 25 years ago was that the competition had only 4 cylinders and it had six. If you can afford the capital outlay and the running costs it has to better with six.
|
|
WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,427
|
Post by WDB on Sept 24, 2017 21:24:50 GMT
Cylinder count is getting less and less relevant, at least where petrol engines are concerned. I've driven the six-cylinder 540i too, and - although it's noticeably faster, of course - the engine doesn't have much more in the way of 'personality', not even the way my five-year-old, six-cylinder diesel does. Evo magazine agrees with me, preferring the 530d - which has a version of the 3.0d engine in my car - to the 540i. Those are both sixes, of course - as is the diesel in a CLS350d. The 530i is perfectly usable, very, very civilized and still faster than most things on the road, and its cylinder count is not a consideration for me.
Its fuel type is. What I am concerned about is a diesel as a long-term ownership prospect, especially starting at this price level. I can see a panicky rush away from diesels, probably starting at the lower end of the market where petrol alternatives are more plentiful, but before long affecting the top end too. Maybe I'm part of that panic if I buy a petrol BMW instead of a diesel Mercedes; I'd probably not be protecting myself from a loss of more than the £9,000 extra (before post-2017 VED) that I'd be paying for the privilege.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2017 0:59:03 GMT
>>What I am concerned about is a diesel as a long-term ownership prospect,
What are you worried about? It its long term then its resale value is hardly relevant. An awful lot of things can happen in that time.
I'd be a darn sight more worried if it was a short-term ownership issue.
|
|
|
Post by dixinormus on Sept 25, 2017 2:46:47 GMT
What's your expected annual mileage WdB? If it's a car for weekends and holidays then it's not going to crack 12,000 a year is it? Hardly diesel territory by the modern day rule of thumb...
|
|
|
Post by Humph on Sept 25, 2017 7:59:08 GMT
We, well, "She" were/was vaguely looking at mildly used Cacti at the weekend. Model for model, the petrol ones were much more highly priced than the diesel ones. In fact, if you decided to just not care about the future of diesels, they represented astonishing value for money. Salesman admitted that people are just not buying them and they're having to discount them heavily to move them.
|
|
WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,427
|
Post by WDB on Sept 25, 2017 8:04:16 GMT
I suppose I need to attempt a total cost of ownership model, with risk provisions for various degrees of diesel devaluation (and possibly punitive fuel taxation too.)
8,000-10,000 miles a year makes petrol the clear choice where there is a choice. But in my case that also comes with new-car depreciation and the post-2017 super-VED. And in this immediate case, the diesel option (the CLS, not the 530d) actually comes at the lower initial price, so it's not a conventional break-even calculation.
It isn't simple because there are cost, risk and desirability factors pulling each way - down to small things like the BMW's opening tailgate window, which would make holiday lunch-stop provisions accessible without having to pull back the bike carrier. And this is without trying to ensure that I realize some of the E220's enhanced trade-in value, which will require the 325 to make way for the new estate.
I'll get there - or not - so forgive my witterings as I turn things over. Hey, we're here to talk about cars, aren't we?
|
|
|
Post by Hofmeister on Sept 25, 2017 8:16:13 GMT
We, well, "She" were/was vaguely looking at mildly used Cacti at the weekend. Model for model, the petrol ones were much more highly priced than the diesel ones. In fact, if you decided to just not care about the future of diesels, they represented astonishing value for money. Salesman admitted that people are just not buying them and they're having to discount them heavily to move them. And the diesel, with its slightly slothful nature and weight ruins the car. Try the 1.2 litre 3 cyl petrol one, naturally aspirated or turbo, it turns cacti into super dash around motors. You would love it.
|
|
WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,427
|
Post by WDB on Sept 25, 2017 10:49:28 GMT
Citroën is doing diesel trade-ins too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2017 11:15:36 GMT
When I bought the Captur, there was no way I was going to buy the diesel even though it was more economical. At that size of car, the weight of the engine would destroy the steering and the mileage done would not justify the extra expense. Who really wants to do 20,000 miles pa in a small car.
|
|
|
Post by commerdriver on Sept 25, 2017 12:16:56 GMT
"Who really wants to do 20,000 miles pa in a small car".
I have averaged 15-16,000 mile in a Golf GTD for the last3.5 years and have enjoyed every bit of it. No desire for a large car for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2017 12:20:00 GMT
But a Golf GTD is a lot more refined and geared up for that sort of mileage. Not sure 20,000 miles in a Captur will be as enjoyable.
|
|
WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,427
|
Post by WDB on Sept 25, 2017 12:52:10 GMT
Did a very rough TCO comparison over four years, modelling the effects of a future government escalator on diesel taxation and an assumed loss of value of diesel vehicles compared with what they fetch today. I reckon it would take a 40% drop to bring the cost of ownership of a 2016 CLS 350d bought for £30,000 roughly level with that of a 530i bought new for £40,000. Of course, my crude assumptions of future values are open to challenge, but I doubt they're that far off - taking a benchmark of 40% of list at three years; likewise my assumption of 40mpg from a 350d and 35mpg from a 530i. I assumed that servicing and insurance will be much the same in either case, but I allowed for the VED surcharge on new, expensive cars, which wouldn't apply to a 2016 car, and allowed £1,000 for a couple of add-ons (including the towbar) that would be in a factory-build 530i but that I'd have to add to a used CLS.
Seems to strengthen the case for the 350d on financial grounds. I also modelled a late-2014 350 CDI, bought at £18,000 - which costs, as you'd expect, significantly less again. In fact it seems pretty clear that I don't save money by buying a 530i, so I have to decide whether it would make up for that in utility or enjoyment.
|
|
|
Post by Humph on Sept 25, 2017 18:33:36 GMT
Quite a good article in the Sunday Times "Driving" section on the V90 Cross Country. Seems very good. Boot would be too small for me though.
|
|