WDB
Full Member
Posts: 7,354
|
Post by WDB on Feb 9, 2017 6:34:32 GMT
Hardly a valid comparison; not like the Mail to present a misleading interpretation of the statistics. Another view might be: the last TG attracted one in ten of the potential BBC audience; what does 2.3m represent as a share of those with access to Prime? And how many of those were new subscribers attracted by GT? If it was half a million, that's £35m or so to Amazon - although many will have signed up without seeing GT, and the challenge now will be to persuade people to stay on for a second year.
|
|
|
Post by Hofmeister on Feb 9, 2017 8:29:12 GMT
Funnily enough, the Daily Mail has been has been tagged as an "unreliable source" by Wikipedia. Tho the term now is I understand " Fake news source"
|
|